Basic information			Substance of the ruling			Accessibility of the case and further relevant links
Date	Name of the case (or case number)	The body delivering the decision	Keywords, topic	Executive part	Brief summary	Full text	Page at the website of the issuing court	Page in other databases	Unofficial materials, press communications
December 20. 2021.	[2021] JMSC Civ. 194	Supreme Court of Jamaica	Vaccination; labor law; dignity	The Supreme Court of Jamaica refused to block the implementation of Digicel's mandatory vaccination policy.	The Supreme Court of Jamaica heard a petition of an employee against the mandatory vaccination policy of Digicel as an employer. The Company obliged its employees to be vaccinated to maintain their current position. The petitioners requested preliminary injunction against the implementation of this policy, however, this was rejected by the Supreme Court as unfounded. The Supreme Court estimated, that the mandatory vaccination policy of the employer did not violate any constitutional right.	https://supremecourt.gov.jm/sites/default/files/judgments/White%2C%20Doric%20v%20Digicel%20%28Jamaica%29%20Limited.pdf	https://supremecourt.gov.jm/content/white-doric-v-digicel-jamaica-limited		http://radiojamaicanewsonline.com/local/supreme-court-denies-applications-for-injunction-brought-against-two-companies-in-relation-to-covid-19-vaccination-policies;
December 20. 2021.	[2021] JMSC Civ 183	Supreme Court of Jamaica	Vaccination; labor law; dignity	The Supreme Court of Jamaica refused to block the implementation of Caribbean Med's mandatory vaccination policy.	The Supreme Court of Jamaica heard a petition of an employee against the mandatory vaccination policy of Caribbean Med as an employer. The Company obliged its employees to be vaccinated to maintain their current position. The petitioners requested preliminary injunction against the implementation of this policy, however, this was rejected by the Supreme Court as unfounded. The Supreme Court estimated, that the mandatory vaccination policy of the employer did not violate any constitutional right.	https://supremecourt.gov.jm/sites/default/files/judgments/Parkins%2C%20Kadian%2C%20Davis%2C%20Tashana%20et%20al%20v%20Cari-Med%20Group%20Limited%20and%20Kirk-FP%20Limited.pdf	https://supremecourt.gov.jm/content/parkins-kadian-davis-tashana-et-al-v-cari-med-group-limited-and-kirk-fp-limited		http://radiojamaicanewsonline.com/local/supreme-court-denies-applications-for-injunction-brought-against-two-companies-in-relation-to-covid-19-vaccination-policies